Happy's Corner

" The Universal Appeal of Monty Python"
by H. C. Lechuk

In a recent column, a TV guide editor raved about the comedy of the "Monty Python" group. He said he loved it but he couldn't quite figure out why. He felt it strange that he and much of the world enjoyed Python so much because a lot of the humor was quite specifically English. Furthermore, he wanted to know if anyone out there could explain to him why he liked it so much. Well, I enjoy Python too. I practically split my gut watching parts of their movies, "The Holy Grail", "The Life of Brian", and "The Meaning of Life." And, I'm a damn curious guy. If I like something or I hate something, I usually figure out why. So, Mr. Editor, here's my two cents worth.

One thing I love about Monty Python is that they don't seem to care who they might offend. As long as it's truthful and funny, they put it out. In Canada and the U.S.A., most TV shows and movies, even the more risqué ones, take pains to be politically correct. Although this doesn't make it impossible to be funny, it makes it awfully difficult to get rip-roaring humor. And, when an outside source like Python throws propriety to the four winds to get a laugh, I get a sense of finally getting something that I've been denied for too long. For example, the Python boys have a skit from "The Meaning of Life" comparing the use of condoms between Protestants and Catholics. The Catholic household has more than thirty children because, according to the father, every sperm is sacred so every time he has sex, there should be some chance of procreation. Condoms are a sin against God. Python turns this idea into an elaborate song and dance number with the parents and the children singing "Every Sperm is Sacred." The family is joined by a dancing chorus of nuns and priests. Even a talking crucifix gets into the act. To avoid copyright infringement, I won't write out a copy of the lyrics here but if you appreciate irreverent humor that hits the nail right on the head, do yourself a favor and rent "The Meaning of Life."

Another thing about Monty Python that I love has to do with another deficiency of North American humor. Generally, we seem to be afraid that the audience won't get the joke. Many shows make things so obvious it gets incredibly dull. There's no such danger with Python. Although they have their pure slapstick moments, there are gems of highbrow humor in their work. In "The Holy Grail", there's a hilarious scene where King Arthur marches through a farm. He stops a local peasant and asks him who his lord is. The peasant turns out to be a member of an 'autonomous commune' where the workers hold regular meetings to elect leaders who will decide on important issues. This worker is completely rude to King Arthur demanding who elected him King. The juxtaposition of feudal society with a kind of deranged socialism is hilarious. At one point, Arthur gets fed up and grabs the worker by the collar demanding some simple answers. The worker yells out "I'm being repressed! I'm being repressed! Did you see that? He repressed me." Arthur gives up in frustration leaving the worker chattering after him.

Finally, the thing that I really love best about Python is that, in addition to creating great bits of comedy, they are often making insightful social commentary at the same time. Although at times, this may not be entirely obvious. I was puzzled for years by the ending of "The Holy Grail." (For those who haven't seen it, please forgive me. I assure you this is not a movie that will be spoiled by knowing the ending.) King Arthur gathers together a large army of knights to prepare for a final charge on a castle where the grail is being held. Just after they start, they are stopped by a squad of modern day police who arrest Arthur and take him away. He is supposedly responsible for murdering a historian who was filming a documentary on the events around the Quest for the Holy Grail. (A bizarre example of creative anachronism.) For years, I thought this was a completely dippy ending. Why such a letdown after such a glorious build-up in the film? Last year, I had my answer.

I was watching a documentary on the Beatles called "The Beatles Anthology." After finishing recording "Abbey Road", the Beatles held an impromptu concert on the roof of their recording studio. It would prove to be their last live performance ever. As the Beatles were a musical phenomenon which essentially defined an era, this was an event of some historical significance. After playing for a while, the set was cut short by the police. Someone had complained about the noise of the concert and the police had to shut the Beatles down. There you have it: the last concert of a rock group who changed the face of music, culture, and to some extent, the whole arts-business-economy relationship, shut down early by the cops for a misdemeanor. Python plays a farce on this by having King Arthur's quest similarly closed down by the British police. What a daring ending! I wonder how many filmmakers in North America have the balls to make an ending like that and hope that someone understands it.

Great show, boys! I'd like to think I share the Python spirit when I say 'Stay happy and don't take no crap!' Until next issue, I am

Yours truly,

Happy.

Go To Happy's Corner Cover Page

Go To MMM Cover Page

© 1996-9 Gopher Productions Inc.

email